The death of King Charles IV
of France in 1328 precipitated a dynastic crisis. Charles’s father, Philip IV of
the house of Capet, had left three sons to continue his line; within fourteen
years, all three were dead without male issue. Philip’s only surviving child
was Isabella, widow of King Edward II of England; the year before Charles’s
death, Isabella’s 14-year-old son had succeeded in the Plantagenet line as
Edward III. The quandary was exacerbated by the fact that Philip V, the elder brother
and immediate predecessor of Charles, had revived the ‘Salic’ law of the ancient
Franks, which excluded women from the royal succession: any claim by Isabella herself
was thereby foreclosed. There was however no explicit obstacle to succession in the female line; and English opinion tended
to the view that the French throne should pass to Edward III as the nearest
surviving male kinsman of Philip IV. The French magnates promoted instead the claim
of Philip of Valois, the nephew of Philip IV through his brother Charles, Count
of Valois. On 29 May 1328 Philip was crowned king of France at Reims, the sixth
of his name.
Arms and the Men
With the outbreak of dynastic
war between the houses of York and Lancaster in 1455, the English were no
longer in any position to pursue their claim to the French throne; peace between
England and France was formally concluded by the Treaty of Picquigny (1475).
The English lost all their continental territory except Calais, finally captured
by the Duke of Guise during the reign of Mary I (1553–1558). The English were
definitively expelled in 1563, and the next year Elizabeth I relinquished her
claim to the city in exchange for a cash settlement. Although the Stuart
monarchs of the following century retained the title ‘King/Queen of France’, subsequent
accessions of territory would be confined to the British side of the Channel. During
the reign of Queen Anne, the last of the Stuarts, the Act of Union joined the
Kingdom of England and Kingdom of Scotland in the Kingdom of Great Britain
(1707); a further Act of Union in 1800 formed the United Kingdom of Great
Britain and Ireland. King George III chose the latter occasion to renounce his claim to the French throne, defunct since 1792. The Jacobite pretenders,
for their part – ‘James III’, ‘Charles III’ and ‘Henry IX’ – styled themselves ‘King
of England, Scotland, France and Ireland’ until the death of the last in 1807.
Arms Race
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhZPAIbU46WfvAx6dGh-MJl0j5qFi8kRe5XuWccJlFFFIT4LbbSKRbsd3N98ePn26dvROWSZHSkwiTRDCdxJPNnN8ReUh0ktIobvYKQsy5Q3VfF3fCUP8IGIbGkH4SxY9YniYNqFkioV0lT/s200/Blog+12c.png)
SUCCESSUS DEBITA LEGI
ANGLIA DANT REGI
FRANCIA SIGNA SUO
M CCCC XII
LAURENTIUS CACHE ME FECIT
These two conjoined devices, owed to the law of succession,
England [and] France bestow upon their king. 1412. Lawrence Cache made me.
The text of the inscription
comprises a single elegiac couplet: hēc
cōniūnctă dŭō sūccēssūs dēbĭtă lēgī |
Ānglĭă dānt rēgī Frāncĭă sīgnă sŭō. Although it is metrically
unexceptionable by Ovidian standards, the couplet exhibits a distinctively
medieval feature: word-rhyme. By contrast with some of the more extravagant specimens of medieval Latin versification, extra-metrical embellishment is here limited to a chiastic structure (A-B-B-A) by which
duo at the caesura and legi at the end of the first verse are
mirrored in the second by regi and suo. In medieval Latin prosody, such
couplets are known as versus cruciferi (cruciform verses).
The shield at the Venerabile
Collegio dates to the year before the death of Henry IV, who introduced the
form of the Plantagenet arms that it bears, and three years before Agincourt,
where Henry V set the stage for the English reconquista
of Normandy. Although the English claim to the throne of France was by then more
than seven decades old, the language of the inscription reflects the vigor with
which it continued to be maintained. The quarrel between the houses of Plantagenet
and Valois had taken its rise from a dynastic situation unprecedented in the
Kingdom of France: a putatively proximate heir whose claim to the throne was in
right of his mother. The categorical formulation that appears in the text – ‘law
of succession’ – reflects a determination to present the issue as settled; and indeed no sooner had Edward III laid claim to the French throne than
English jurists set about building a case to support his title. While they did
not challenge the French exclusion of female claimants, the lawyers did reject
the contention that the ban extended to cognates (relatives on the female side).
Given that Edward, the nephew of Charles IV, was the late king’s kinsman in the
second degree, the claim of Philip of Valois – Charles’s cousin and thus his
kinsman in the third degree – was patently inferior.